UK Politics
Burnham Gags His Cabinet on Europe Until the ‘Next Parliament’, Two Days After Saying He Wants to Rejoin the EU
Burnham has banned ministers from backing any EU option until the next Parliament, two days after saying he wants Britain back in the EU in his lifetime.
Your vote
Should Burnham let his ministers speak freely on rejoining the EU?
News | By Matt, Editor
Andy Burnham has told his Cabinet to stop talking about Britain’s future in Europe. In a letter to ministers on Wednesday, the Prime Minister said: “It will not be appropriate for ministers individually to advocate for specific options or opine on the likely outcome of the process.” (BBC News, 28 October 2026; The Independent)
Two days earlier he told ITV’s Good Morning Britain he would like to see Britain rejoin the EU: “In my lifetime, I would like to see that happen but I am not going to move ahead of the public.” (Politico, 26 October 2026; The Guardian) GB News reported the gag order this morning, saying ministers who want to speak out “must resign”. (GB News, 29 October 2026)
Key facts
- The gag: an “agreed mandate” for the 20 November EU summit, which is “Government policy to which Cabinet collective responsibility applies”. (Cabinet letter, 28 Oct)
- The timetable: after the summit, Government policy is “to explore options for the long-term relationship with the EU for consideration in the next Parliament”. (Cabinet letter)
- The PM’s own view: he wants Britain back in the EU “in my lifetime”, but is “not proposing rejoining in this Parliament”. (Politico)
- The Makerfield pledge: “I am not proposing that the UK considers rejoining the EU.” (BBC News, 18 May 2026)
- The promise: “There will be no return to the single market, the customs union, or freedom of movement.” (Labour manifesto, 2024)
What the letter says
Burnham wrote that the Brexit deal negotiated by the Conservatives was “not good enough for Britain” and “a harder Brexit than was promised”. He added: “I am also clear that any fundamental change to the direction of the relationship would be for the public to decide and a matter for the next Parliament.” (The Independent)
Have your sayTap to comment“At the end of this process, we will set out to the country the respective merits and drawbacks of the various options,” he wrote. “It is important that we remain aligned and disciplined as a Government in our messaging throughout this period.” (BBC News) GB News presented these words as an ITV interview. The BBC and PA report them from his letter to Cabinet.
Under collective responsibility, ministers who cannot back an agreed Government position are expected to stay quiet or resign, though the Prime Minister decides how strictly it is enforced. (Institute for Government; Ministerial Code)
Makerfield was told something else
Burnham won the Makerfield by-election on 18 June. (UK Parliament election results) In a speech in Leeds on 18 May, during the campaign, he said: “The last thing we should do right now is re-run those arguments… I respect the decision that was made at the referendum and it is going to undermine everything I have said about strengthening democracy if we don’t respect that vote.” (BBC News)
On Monday he said: “I am respecting what I said to the voters in Makerfield, but I’m not going to say this morning, sitting here, that the deal we’ve got at the moment is good enough for Britain.” (Manchester Evening News) At the weekend he had called for an “honest discussion” about free movement, as we reported on his 2016 “race to the bottom” warning.
Badenoch: ‘Who wants free movement?’
At Prime Minister’s Questions on Wednesday, Kemi Badenoch said the Prime Minister had “popped up on telly and opened his mouth without engaging his brain, not for the first time”. She told MPs the Home Secretary, the Business Secretary and the Culture Secretary did not want the debate either. (Hansard, 28 October 2026)
“What about his Back Benchers? Let’s have a show of hands—who wants free movement? I know the Prime Minister does not want to look behind him, but nobody raised their hand.” Burnham replied: “There is no confusion at all. The Government have a collectively agreed position… The red lines in our manifesto, including those on freedom of movement, will stay firmly in place for the whole of this Parliament.” (Hansard)
Who in Cabinet is sceptical
GB News names Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood, Lisa Nandy and Yvette Cooper as Eurosceptic Cabinet ministers. (GB News) The source is The i Paper, which describes all three as cautious or “less enthusiastic” about rejoining. It also reported that around 15 of the 28 ministers attending Cabinet back a return to the bloc, against 13 “either undecided or opposed”. (The i Paper, 23 October 2026)
The i Paper says Mahmood was “furious” at not being told in advance about the Prime Minister’s free movement remarks, and that a Government source said they “undermined” her immigration strategy. (The i Paper, 26 October 2026) On the same day, Chancellor John Healey ruled out free movement only “for this Parliament”, as we reported this morning. Burnham told MPs the Conservative deal had been “bad for control of immigration” (Hansard), though small boat arrivals are a separate question, as our explainer sets out.
Past PMs let ministers speak
In 1975 Harold Wilson suspended collective responsibility for the referendum campaign. Seven Cabinet ministers campaigned for a No vote: Michael Foot, Tony Benn, Peter Shore, Barbara Castle, Eric Varley, Willie Ross and John Silkin. (BBC News)
In 2016 David Cameron did the same. Michael Gove, Chris Grayling, Iain Duncan Smith, John Whittingdale, Theresa Villiers and Priti Patel, who attended Cabinet, backed Leave. Boris Johnson, then Mayor of London, was not a minister. (The Guardian; Institute for Government) Both suspensions came during referendum campaigns. There is no referendum now, so Burnham can say the cases differ. He is still choosing silence over an open debate.
Our view
This section is opinion.
In our view, Burnham is playing a long game. In public, Brexit is “settled” for this Parliament: the red lines stay, the voters of Makerfield are “respected”. In private, the Prime Minister wants Britain back in the EU in his lifetime and has written the timetable down: options explored now, decided “in the next Parliament”.
The gag order fits that plan. It keeps the Eurosceptics in his Cabinet quiet, and it keeps the Rejoiners quiet too, until the moment suits. Then, we suspect, the Remainer cavalry will be let loose on Brexit at the next election. If the Prime Minister wants to rejoin, he should say so plainly to the people who elected him in Makerfield, and let his ministers argue it out in the open, as Wilson and Cameron did.
FAQ
Has Burnham said he wants to rejoin the EU?
Yes, “in my lifetime”, on 26 October 2026. He said he is not proposing it in this Parliament. (Politico)
Can ministers speak out against the plan?
Not while they stay in post. Burnham’s letter says collective responsibility applies and ministers should not “advocate for specific options”. (BBC News)
Sources
- GB News, 29 October 2026: Andy Burnham gags Cabinet on rejoin EU plot
- BBC News: Burnham’s Cabinet letter and PMQs (28 Oct); Burnham’s Leeds speech (18 May)
- The Independent: report on the Cabinet letter (28 Oct); Hansard: PMQs, 28 October 2026
- Politico: Burnham on rejoining in his lifetime; The Guardian: Burnham on the Brexit deal; Manchester Evening News: Burnham’s GMB interview (all 26 Oct)
- The i Paper: Cabinet split on rejoining (23 Oct); Mahmood and Cabinet anger (26 Oct)
- Institute for Government: Collective responsibility; GOV.UK: Ministerial Code; UK Parliament: Makerfield by-election result
- BBC News: the 1975 Cabinet split; The Guardian: the 2016 Cabinet Leavers; Labour Party: 2024 manifesto
- Main image: Prime Minister Andy Burnham at the Cabinet table, 10 Downing Street. Photo: Number 10/Flickr (Crown copyright).
Discover more from Breaking Brexit News
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Share this story everywhere
Have your say