Listen
Tap play to hear this story.
Reform UK is facing a significant ‘woman problem’ due to its ‘masculine image’ and failure to address past offensive remarks by candidates, according to Gawain Towler, a senior member of the party’s governing board. This stark warning follows a disappointing by-election result in Makerfield.
Mr Towler, Reform’s former head of communications, issued his critical assessment after the party’s candidate, Robert Kenyon, was decisively beaten by Labour in the Makerfield by-election. Despite hopes of a close contest, Labour’s Andy Burnham secured a victory by over 9,000 votes.
Makerfield By-Election Exposes Deeper Issues
During the Makerfield campaign, Mr Kenyon faced scrutiny for previous social media comments, including an offensive post targeting Welsh broadcaster Carole Vorderman. Party leader Nigel Farage dismissed these remarks as ‘a few laddish things’ from ‘a decade ago’, a stance that Mr Towler now claims cost Reform crucial female support.
Mr Towler’s Substack post highlighted the party’s decision not to issue an apology for Mr Kenyon’s comments. He described Makerfield as a “wake-up call,” arguing that Reform is “addressing one half of the electorate as though the other half were not in the room.”
The Cost of Dismissing Concerns
“I lost count of being told about Reform-minded women, women who wanted to vote for us, who would not in the end put a cross beside a man who had said those things and never honestly taken them back. A proper apology would have been enough, but it was not forthcoming.”
— Gawain Towler, Reform UK Governing Board Member
Mr Towler explained that these Reform-friendly women, understanding of working-class language, were not demanding Mr Kenyon’s removal but simply a genuine apology. The party’s dismissal of the controversy as “banter” or an “establishment confection” failed to resonate on the doorstep, directly impacting votes.
- Reform’s ‘masculine image’ alienates female voters, warns senior board member.
- Party candidate Robert Kenyon’s past offensive comments cost Reform votes in Makerfield.
- Nigel Farage dismissed remarks as ‘laddish things’, but no apology was issued.
- “The woman problem has a number attached now, and a lost seat behind it,” states Towler.
- Authentic engagement with women’s communities is crucial for Reform’s future success.
What This Means for Britain
This isn’t just about one by-election; it’s about a fundamental disconnect that impacts every British family. When a party fails to connect with half the electorate, it risks ignoring the very real concerns of mothers, daughters, and wives across the nation. This oversight can lead to policies that neglect vital services like maternity provision or domestic abuse support, directly affecting your family’s safety and well-being.
Economically, alienating a significant portion of the voting public means a party cannot truly represent the diverse needs of the workforce or consumer base. This could lead to a lack of investment in areas crucial for women’s economic empowerment, ultimately hindering national prosperity and increasing the cost of living for everyone.
Politically, this pattern of behaviour from Reform UK, dismissing legitimate concerns as “banter,” signals a dangerous precedent. It suggests a party unwilling to listen or adapt, potentially leading to a political establishment that is out of touch and unaccountable to a large segment of the population.
The stakes are clear: if Reform continues down this path, it risks becoming a niche party, unable to deliver the change Britain desperately needs. Every voter, male and female, deserves a party that genuinely represents their interests, not one that alienates half the country.
Share if you believe Britain deserves better than a political party that alienates half the population. Demand answers from your MP. This must be seen by every British voter.
Source: Daily Mail | Breaking Brexit News
Discover more from Breaking Brexit News
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.













Join the discussion
I don’t think so. Reform lost Makerfield because of tactical voting. The greens and Limp Dems lost their deposits and if you check the figures from the 2024 election they lost over three thousand votes between them.
I don’t think those votes went to Reform. You had three thousand votes for Restore. Restore also poisoned the Reform vote telling people on the door lies and the van they drove round Makerfield saying Vote Reform Get Muslims.
Restore Britain Limited must have put people off and they voted labour to get Starmer out because they knew Restore was a damp squib. That was the problem not women.
Totally Agree