Burnham Accused Of Forcing 1,250 Migrants On Tiny Village

GB News Politics reveals that Andy Burnham’s government is facing fierce backlash after pushing ahead with plans to house 1,250 asylum seekers in a tiny Oxfordshire village. Piddington Parish Council chair Tim McNally slammed the move for happening with zero local consultation.

Zero Consultation And No Infrastructure

Residents in the rural community near Bicester have been left stunned after learning that a former Ministry of Defence base has been earmarked to house 1,250 migrants. The tiny village, which counts a local population of just 350 adults, faces being completely overwhelmed by the scale of the camp.

According to GB News Politics, preparation work at the site has already begun despite the location currently lacking essential utilities such as water and electricity. Locals point out that the infrastructure simply does not exist to support such a massive influx.

Parish Council Chair Hits Out

Tim McNally, chair of Piddington Parish Council, didn’t hold back when speaking to broadcasters about the lack of communication from Westminster. He stressed that local people have been completely ignored in a decision that fundamentally alters their neighbourhood.

He is forcing them to accept a camp for migrants in their community with no consultation and before a security review has taken place.

— Tim McNally, Chair of Piddington Parish Council, GB News Politics

The total absence of a prior security review has compounded fears among residents. Families living nearby argue that safety concerns are being brushed aside in a rush to secure alternative accommodation options.

• 1,250 migrants earmarked for the former MoD base near Piddington
• Local adult population stands at just 350 residents
• Site currently lacks water, electricity, and basic living infrastructure
• Preparation work began with zero consultation from government officials
• Security reviews and local impact assessments have not taken place

A Community Left In The Dark

The situation in Oxfordshire highlights a growing disconnect between central government policy and rural communities left to bear the brunt of housing decisions. With preparations already underway on the ground, residents have little recourse as authorities press forward.

As the project advances without local backing, questions over accountability and rural infrastructure will only intensify. The government’s refusal to consult risks setting a deeply controversial precedent for how regional dispersal sites are handled across the country.

This is a stark reminder of how top-down governance steamrolls local opposition without a second thought.