Listen
Tap play to hear this story.
Labour has confirmed its unwavering commitment to hand over the Chagos Islands to Mauritius, despite former US President Donald Trump previously halting the deal. Fears are now escalating that this “surrender” could be resurrected imminently.
The controversial agreement, which involves the UK relinquishing sovereignty over the strategic archipelago, appeared to be dead and buried in April. This followed a decisive intervention from Donald Trump, who labelled the proposed handover an “act of total weakness” and withdrew American support.
The Resurfacing of a Controversial Deal
Despite Trump’s firm stance, the prospect of the Chagos Islands giveaway has re-emerged. Attorney General Lord Hermer recently informed MPs that he remains hopeful the deal could be signed “in the coming weeks and months,” reigniting concerns among those who oppose the transfer.
Under the original arrangement, brokered by Sir Keir Starmer’s government, Britain would not only surrender the territory but also commit to paying approximately £35 billion over a 99-year period to lease back the vital joint military base on Diego Garcia.
Attorney General’s Justification
“The Chagos treaty and agreement is overwhelmingly in our national interest. The negotiations that we picked up from the last Conservative Government, which were very developed negotiations, were started and we continued with them because of our national security analysis as to the importance of the base of Diego Garcia.”
— Lord Hermer, Attorney General
Lord Hermer’s statement to the Commons Justice Select Committee attempts to justify the deal by citing national security concerns and the importance of the Diego Garcia base. He expressed hope for the treaty’s signing, reiterating that it is deemed to be “in the national interest of this country.”
Key Concerns Over the Chagos Handover
- Labour remains “determined” to proceed with the Chagos Islands handover to Mauritius.
- Donald Trump previously shut down the deal, branding it an “act of total weakness.”
- The UK would pay £35 billion over 99 years to lease back the military base after surrendering sovereignty.
- Attorney General Lord Hermer hopes the deal could be signed “in the coming weeks and months.”
- The Labour government claims the deal is “overwhelmingly in our national interest” due to national security concerns.
What This Means for Britain
This potential surrender of British territory, coupled with a staggering £35 billion lease payment, represents a profound betrayal of national interests. Such a colossal sum could otherwise fund vital public services, improve your NHS appointments, or reduce the heating bills for working families across the country.
The economic implications are severe, diverting billions from the British taxpayer into a lease agreement for a base we once owned outright. This financial burden will directly impact the cost of living and limit investment in our own economy.
Politically, this move highlights a troubling pattern of weakness and a willingness to concede strategic assets. It undermines Britain’s standing on the global stage and raises serious questions about the government’s commitment to defending British sovereignty and assets.
If this deal proceeds, it sets a dangerous precedent for future territorial disputes and demonstrates a clear failure to protect our national assets. Every British voter must understand the long-term consequences of this decision NOW.
This must be seen by every British voter. Demand answers from your MP and share if you believe Britain deserves better.
Source: GB News Politics | Breaking Brexit News
Discover more from Breaking Brexit News
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.













Join the discussion
Since we own it at the moment why give it away and spend billions in using it, what mind blowing idiocy the governments are. it is like selling your car and leasing it back at an over the top rate. I just hope if this goes through that Reform reverses it. the Chagonians don’t want it, we don’t want it, the USA don’t want it and it is a RISK to security to the UK and the USA
Sell it to the USA. Let them take the money exist flack.ent