Skip to stories

London 10° Edinburgh 9° Cardiff 9° Belfast 11°

Breaking

UK Politics

Palestine Action activists face ‘terrorist’ sentencing after £1MILLION defence firm raid

Your vote

Do you back this story?

Matt · 13 May 2026 · 11:00 · 4 min read · 6 reads

Palestine Action activists face 'terrorist' sentencing after £1MILLION defence firm raid

0Shares

f

Palestine Action activists face ‘terrorist’ sentencing after £1MILLION defence firm raid

Four Palestine Action activists, convicted of causing £1 million damage to a defence firm, could be sentenced under terrorism legislation next month. One activist fractured a police officer’s spine during the raid.

Terrorism Designation Looms for Activists

Four Palestine Action activists face potential sentencing under terrorism legislation. Charlotte Head, Samuel Corner, Leona Kamio, and Fatema Rajwani were convicted last week. They caused approximately £1 million damage to an Elbit Systems facility in Bristol. The incident occurred on August 6, 2024. Mr Justice Johnson made a pre-trial determination. He established the offences carried a “terrorist connection”.

The judge is scheduled to pass sentence on June 12. This designation could still apply. This is despite a High Court ruling in February. That ruling found the Government’s ban on Palestine Action unlawful. The Government’s appeal against this decision is still before the Court of Appeal.

Raid Details and Injuries

The group gained entry by ramming a decommissioned prison van through the site. They used sledgehammers and crowbars. During the overnight operation, Samuel Corner fractured police sergeant Kate Evans’ spine. He was separately convicted of grievous bodily harm for this act. Wearing red boilersuits, the activists recorded themselves. They destroyed equipment, including computers and drones. They sprayed red paint throughout the building using fire extinguishers.

1 commentTap to read

The defendants maintained their actions were necessary. They claimed to protect Palestinian lives. They intended to inflict maximum damage on military equipment. This was to prevent its deployment against civilians in Gaza. Two other individuals, Zoe Rogers and Jordan Devlin, were acquitted. They faced criminal damage charges alongside the four convicted.

  • Four Palestine Action activists convicted of £1 million damage.
  • Sentencing under terrorism legislation possible next month.
  • One activist, Samuel Corner, fractured a police officer’s spine.
  • Activists used a decommissioned prison van to breach the site.
  • Judge restricted defence evidence regarding motivations and beliefs.
  • Palestine Action was designated a terrorist organisation last July.

What This Means for Britain

This case highlights the growing challenges facing British law enforcement and the justice system. The £1 million damage bill for a defence firm ultimately impacts the taxpayer. This is not just about corporate losses. It is about the cost of security, repairs, and the diversion of police resources. Ordinary working families pay for these costs through taxes. They also face the consequences of reduced police presence elsewhere. The fractured spine of a police officer shows the real human cost. Frontline officers are put in harm’s way. This incident demonstrates a clear disregard for law and order. It also raises questions about the effectiveness of current security measures. British businesses, especially those in sensitive sectors, need protection. They cannot operate under constant threat of such incursions.

The application of terrorism legislation in this context sets a significant precedent. It moves beyond traditional definitions of terrorism. It now includes acts of criminal damage with specific political motivations. This broadens the scope of counter-terrorism powers. It also raises concerns among civil liberties groups. They question the balance between security and protest rights. The ongoing legal battle over Palestine Action’s proscription adds complexity. The High Court ruled the ban unlawful. The Government is appealing this. This legal uncertainty creates a grey area for activists and authorities alike. It leaves both sides unsure of the legal boundaries. This lack of clarity undermines public confidence in the justice system’s consistency.

The outcome of this sentencing will have far-reaching implications. It will define how politically motivated criminal acts are prosecuted in Britain. If the terrorism connection is applied, prison terms will be extended. Convicts will face years of monitoring by counter-terrorism officers. This will be a stark message to other activist groups. It signals a tougher stance from the justice system. The Court of Appeal’s decision on Palestine Action’s proscription is also critical. It will clarify the legal status of the group. This could influence future arrests and prosecutions. British citizens should watch these developments closely. They will shape the future of protest, security, and justice in the UK. The government must ensure that law and order are upheld. They must also protect the rights of all citizens. This case is a test of both.

Share if you believe law and order must be upheld in Britain.

This article is a factual summary of reporting by GB News. Full original story available on their website. All quotes directly attributed.

Tags: Palestine Action, Elbit Systems, Terrorism, Criminal Damage, UK Justice, Police

Source: GB News | Breaking Brexit News


Discover more from Breaking Brexit News

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

0Shares

f

Have your say

Legitimate protest, is not even worth talking about in this case. Ramming a van into the premises, a million pounds worth of damage and a serious assault on s police officer with a sledge hammer is terrorism not protest.
An extremely long prison sentence is the only answer.

Your reaction

Breaking Streeting Moves Into ‘£70m’ Taxpayer Mansion After Lammy Finally Leaves Carlton Gardens Read more
Next