UK Politics
Starmer’s Greenland stance explodes Chagos contradiction as islanders protest surrender deal
The Prime Minister states that Greenland's sovereignty is for its people to decide without outside influence, yet Britain is transferring sovereignty of the Chagos Islands to Mauritius, neglecting Chagossian input. Campaigners express anger over forced removals and a lack of consultation, raising human rights concerns and questioning unequal self-determination.
Your vote
Do you back this story?
- Chagossians say they were never consulted on sovereignty transfer
- UK to pay up to £30bn leasing back its own strategic base
- UN warns deal breaches Chagossian human rights
The Prime Minister has been crystal clear on Greenland. Sovereignty, he says, is for the people of Greenland and Denmark to decide. No outside pressure. No arm-twisting. No shortcuts.
Yet when it comes to the Chagos Islands, that principle suddenly vanishes. Britain is handing sovereignty to Mauritius without asking the Chagossian people at all.
In Parliament Square, anger boiled over. Chagossian campaigner Vanessa Mandarin told GB News: “We want to remain British.” Her family, like thousands of others, was forcibly removed decades ago. Now they face losing their homeland again, this time by ministerial pen.
The deal, signed last May, hands sovereignty to Mauritius while leasing back Diego Garcia, home to a vital UK-US military base, at a cost of roughly £100m a year. Over a century, estimates run as high as £30bn. Britain pays. Britain loses sovereignty.
7 commentsTap to readLegal challenges argue the Government breached basic human rights by refusing consultation. The irony is hard to miss. This is a Labour government led by a former human rights lawyer, accused of sidelining the very people affected.
The House of Lords has already inflicted defeats, backing amendments demanding safeguards and scrutiny. Former Northern Ireland First Minister Baroness Foster has asked the obvious question: why do Greenlanders get self-determination, but Chagossians do not?
Even the United Nations Committee on Racial Discrimination has raised “grave concerns”, warning the deal risks perpetuating longstanding rights violations. Labour insists its hands were tied by a 2019 advisory opinion from the UN court in The Hague. Advisory, not binding.
With geopolitics tightening and the US watching closely, some hope Donald Trump may yet intervene on security grounds. For now, Chagossians are left asking why their voice matters less than everyone else’s.
Discover more from Breaking Brexit News
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Have your say
This hapless government and PM stumble from crisis to crisis ,but is interesting to note the total disregard they have for the concerns of all British citizens, whether at home or overseas. Unfortunately,when this fool is unseated in May, there is a whole line of equally inept individuals straining at the leash to take his job. Hopefully ,the approx 20% of registered electorate who voted these clowns into office now understand the consequences of their inadvisable actions.
You really have to question the sanity and intelligence of the imbicile who did this deal even if it was with one of his lifelong friends corrupt or just inept
Inept, and possibly corruption involved !!Lord Hermer wasn’t it?
Communist Liebour Party
This is typical; Starmer and Labour Government policy , Two tier rules being enacted which is seen as discriminatory and one rule for one, and one rule for another. Niot a good look at all this Labour Government needs to go!
Just how much more of this TOOL do we have to endure ? He is making this country a world-wide laughing-stock !
I future, we need to thoroughly investigate the background and personality of those we entrust with the governing of our country, in order to avoid this ridiculous state of affairs happening again.
A public inquiry should be instigated into the way these so-called ‘politicians’ are set loose on us !
Your reaction
This is a typical two teir government