UK Politics
80 Offences, 11 Arrests and a Tag Never Fitted: Serial Greggs Shoplifter Spared Jail Under Labour’s Sentencing Rules
A Brixton Greggs shoplifter who admitted 80 offences walked free with a suspended sentence under new jail rules, and the Met calls it a disappointment.
Your vote
Should prolific shoplifters go to prison, even when the sentence is under a year?
News | By Matt, Editor
She admitted 80 offences. She had been arrested, charged and remanded to court 11 times since May, after going back again and again to the same Greggs in Brixton. And on Wednesday Croydon Magistrates’ Court gave her a suspended sentence, because, as the Metropolitan Police put it, new rules now “require a sentence of less than a year to be suspended unless very specific exceptions apply”.
The Met did not hide its frustration. It estimates officers spent more than 120 hours on this one case. The court ordered her to wear a GPS tag. It was never fitted.
Key facts
- Tiffany O’Neill, 28, pleaded guilty to a total of 80 offences and was given 26 weeks in prison, suspended for 12 months, at Croydon Magistrates’ Court on 11 November (Met Police).
- She was charged with 69 theft offences, including stealing more than £2,000 of soft drinks from a single Greggs on Electric Avenue, Brixton.
- She was arrested, charged and remanded to court 11 times since May, and was granted bail at all but one appearance despite repeatedly breaching her bail conditions.
- A bail condition banned her from Lambeth and required a GPS tag. The Met says the tag “was never fitted”.
- Three sentencing hearings were adjourned because she failed to turn up, and a fourth was delayed this week by technical problems at the court.
- She has been given a two-year Criminal Behaviour Order banning her from Brixton town centre and every Greggs in the UK.
Why she did not go to prison
The answer is in the Met’s own statement. Constraints on magistrates and judges that “came into force earlier this year” mean a jail term of under a year has to be suspended unless narrow exceptions apply. The Independent notes that under the new guidelines, intended to ease prison overcrowding, “almost all custodial sentences under a year are currently suspended”. The rule comes from the Sentencing Act 2026, which became law in January and has applied to anyone convicted since 22 March. A 26-week term sits right inside that net.
Have your sayTap to commentBack in April we reported Telegraph figures suggesting up to 12,000 prolific shoplifters could avoid jail once Labour’s new sentencing law took effect. This is what one of them looks like in court.
What the police said
Sergeant Chris Wilkinson, who led the investigation, said officers “worked relentlessly over several months” to get her before the courts. “We recognise that courts are obliged to follow the guidelines on suspending sentences, but it’s obviously a disappointment that someone who we know has reoffended so frequently is now back out in the community.”
Assistant Commissioner Matt Twist went further. “We are increasingly arresting the same people again and again when they ignored bail or license conditions, not complied with their electronic tags, or in many cases all of the above,” he said, according to the Daily Mail. “The cumulative impact on retailers and their staff is enormous.”
Met figures published in June showed that just 104 prolific shoplifters in London were linked to 4,389 offences over two financial years, almost a third of all incidents where a suspect was identified.
The tag that never was
The detail that should worry ministers most is the tag. A court made a GPS tag a condition of her bail. Nobody fitted it, and she kept going back to the same shop. Ministers keep telling the public that tags and supervision make early release and community sentences safe. Here the court ordered one and it simply did not happen.
Graham Wettone, a policing commentator with 30 years in the police, put it simply: officers did their job, with 80 offences identified and charged, and the justice system “is one of the main issues”.
Who pays
Shop theft is not victimless, and it is not cheap. The British Retail Consortium’s 2026 crime survey counted 5.45 million customer theft incidents in a year, with £408 million in known losses, and nearly £1 billion spent on security. The BRC says those costs “feed through to higher prices and reduced availability for customers”. So everyone who buys a sausage roll or a can of pop pays a little towards it.
Greggs chief executive Roisin Currie said persistent theft has “a real impact on those in our shops” and welcomed “meaningful consequences for those who repeatedly target retailers”. She also wants more focus on services that stop people reoffending. The charity Revolving Doors said repeat offending is often driven by addiction, mental health problems and homelessness, but said the anger of shop workers “is justified”.
The government’s side
Ministers argue short jail terms do not work and that community sentences cut reoffending. Prisons are close to full. Justice Secretary Alex Norris, who took over the Ministry of Justice in July, told POLITICO in September, discussing early release: “We would like to have gone further and kept more categories of offender in prison for longer, but we also have to have enough prison places in this country.” The jails are full, so the people the police catch over and over stay out.
And the timing could hardly be worse. On the same day she was sentenced, the Home Office announced a year-long scheme for 16 police forces to target 500 of the most prolific shoplifters in the country, according to The Independent. The police can target them all they like. If the courts are told to suspend the sentence, they walk straight back out.
The reaction
Reform’s Zia Yusuf posted today that Labour’s early release is leaving victims considering moving house. He says it takes officers an average of 39 days to arrest people who breach tagging conditions once a warrant has been issued, and that 5,000 criminals were released without tags despite court orders. Those are his figures, not ours, but the Brixton case is a live example of the tag problem he is describing. It is the same pattern we saw with the early-release tranches and with the crime data ministers would rather not publish.
Our view
Nobody is pretending a woman stealing fizzy drinks is the worst criminal in London. That is not the point. The point is that the police caught her, charged her and brought her back again and again, 11 times, and the system still could not stop her walking straight back into the same shop. A tag was ordered and never fitted. Three hearings fell through because she did not turn up. And at the end of it the law told the magistrates that prison was off the table.
Labour wrote that law to save prison places. Fair enough, say it plainly. But do not then tell shop staff, who face this every day, that the system is on their side. When the Met itself goes public to call the result “obviously a disappointment”, the rules have failed. A suspended sentence for someone who kept breaking her bail, with a tag that never existed, is not a punishment. It is a pause.
Should prolific shoplifters go to prison, even when the sentence is under a year? Vote in our poll below.
Sources
Metropolitan Police, 11 November 2026; The Telegraph, 11 November 2026; The Standard; The Independent; Daily Mail; British Retail Consortium Crime Survey 2026; POLITICO, 28 September 2026.
Images: Justice Secretary Alex Norris, pictured as Border Security Minister in Belgium, March 2026 (UK Home Office, CC BY 4.0), and a Greggs shop front in York, used for illustration only (Malcolmxl5, CC0).
Discover more from Breaking Brexit News
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Don’t stop here
280,000 Corridor Care Cases This Summer, and Patients on A&E Waiting-Room Chairs Aren’t Even Counted
Under-25s Would Lose Sickness Benefits and PIP Under Milburn’s Welfare Plan, Even Those Already Claiming
Have your say