Skip to stories

London 13° Edinburgh 9° Cardiff 11° Belfast 9°

Breaking

UK Politics

JD Vance hammers Europe for fining Musk then begging Starlink

JD Vance Starlink remarks expose Europe fining Elon Musk’s firms then pleading for his satellites when war bites.

Your vote

Should Europe quit attacking Musk while using his tech?

Matt · 23 Oct 2026 · 20:07 · 3 min read · 236 reads

JD Vance speaking as Starlink and Europe row dominates the clip JD Vance Starlink

Share this story everywhere

2 shares

US Vice President JD Vance has torn into European governments for waging regulatory war on Elon Musk then racing to his door for Starlink help in Ukraine. In remarks captured on video and shared in a post on X by Mo Elgaraihy, Vance said it was “truly ironic” that countries with “nothing like the technology that Elon has developed” still “wage regulatory and licensing war against SpaceX” before “running to SpaceX saying, please do what we need you to do.”

The comments came when a reporter raised Wall Street Journal claims about Starlink and Starshield decisions in the Ukraine conflict, and whether Republicans wanted an investigation. Vance refused to turn the story into a personal hunt. He stressed that Musk “runs a private corporation” and that it is “completely understandable that he doesn’t want to get in the middle of what is a war between two state actors without the United States government effectively directing him on what to do.”

Vance made plain the real question is American policy toward Ukraine and Russia, not a private boss. He noted renewed negotiations are under way, then swung back to the double standard. Europe, he said, depends on American technology, American businesses and the American military, “while at the same time European political leaders love to bash the United States allies that they depend upon so much.”

That is the heart of it. Britain and the wider continent cannot keep treating successful American builders as punching bags one week and emergency utilities the next. Sovereignty means standing on your own feet, not fining the man who built the network you suddenly need and then acting entitled to his satellites. A country that wants to run itself does not outsource its backbone to someone it spends years trying to crush through licensing and penalties.

Private firm, not a public utility

Vance underlined that Musk’s companies are private. Starlink and the wider SpaceX stack are not free public property for any capital to commandeer when a war turns awkward. Guidance, if any, should come from the Pentagon or the President, not from European regulators who have already chosen confrontation. The vice president dismissed the idea that the episode is “about Elon” and kept the focus on state policy.

European capitals have piled rules and fines onto the X platform and SpaceX while possessing no comparable home-grown system. Then, when Ukraine needs connectivity, the same capitals arrive with open hands. Vance called the pattern out without apology. Dependence paired with constant political bashing is not alliance; it is freeloading dressed up as virtue.

The clip leaves little room for soft language. Countries that “don’t possess a shred of technology remotely comparable” still launch the regulatory assault, then plead for activation when the battlefield demands it. Musk is under no obligation to insert a private firm into a war between states unless his own government sets the course. That is basic commercial and national sense.

What the row leaves exposed

For British viewers the lesson is blunt. Heavy-handed Brussels-style regulation and the habit of sneering at American capacity leave Europe weaker when the crisis arrives. If leaders want resilient networks they should build them, buy them openly, or stop the daily assault on the people who already did the hard work. Begging after the fine is not strategy.

Vance tied the moment to a longer argument the White House has made for years: allies who rely on US tech and US force still find time to attack the very partners they need. The Starlink episode simply makes the contradiction impossible to miss. Private innovation is not a European common good to be licensed into submission and summoned at will.

Original source: Mo Elgaraihy (@EngMoElgaraihy)

Have your say below 👇


Discover more from Breaking Brexit News

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Share this story everywhere

2 shares

Have your say

Your reaction

Breaking Healey eyes carbon charge on fuel imports that could hit pumps Read more
Next

Discover more from Breaking Brexit News

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading