Listen
Tap play to hear this story.
Andy Burnham’s new government is reportedly set to reinstate the UK’s commitment to spending 0.7% of Gross National Income on international aid, reversing a policy enacted by previous administrations. This significant policy shift is outlined in a roadmap expected to be a cornerstone of his premiership, as reported by The Telegraph.
The Return of the 0.7% Target
Prime Minister Andy Burnham is poised to announce a plan to restore the United Kingdom’s international aid budget to 0.7% of Gross National Income (GNI). This ambitious target, a long-standing commitment that was legislated under Gordon Brown, was controversially scaled back by the Conservative government in 2020 and further reduced by Keir Starmer’s Labour. The move signals a clear intent to re-engage on the world stage with a substantial financial commitment.
The roadmap, which is expected to detail the trajectory for this increase, will form a key part of Burnham’s broader governmental shake-up. This is not merely a tweak but a wholesale reversal of recent policy, returning to a level of spending that many in the international development community have long championed.
A Costly Reversal and Political Fallout
The decision to restore the 0.7% target is not without its critics, particularly given the current economic climate. Nigel Farage, the leader of Reform UK, wasted no time in condemning the prospective policy, stating, “Andy Burnham plans to spend an extra £10bn of your money on foreign aid. I will always put British people first.” Such a substantial increase in spending will undoubtedly face scrutiny over its impact on domestic priorities and the public purse.
The previous cuts, which saw the aid budget fall to 0.3% and then 0.2% of GNI, were justified by the government as necessary fiscal measures, particularly in the wake of the pandemic. Keir Starmer’s administration further reduced aid to fund defence initiatives, a decision that led to the resignation of then-development minister Anneliese Dodds. Burnham’s move directly repudiates these earlier decisions, signalling a different set of priorities for his government.
“What matters is not mechanical annual targets, but establishing a credible long-term trajectory that partner governments, multilateral institutions, NGOs and local organisations can plan around.”
— Fleur Anderson, Former Minister and Labour MP, The Guardian
The Road Ahead: Challenges and Expectations
The path to restoring the 0.7% target will be complex. While some Labour MPs, such as Fleur Anderson, have advocated for a ten-year plan to reach the goal, the immediate financial implications are significant. Anderson herself noted the importance of a “credible long-term trajectory” over “mechanical annual targets” for effective international planning.
Experts are already weighing in on the challenges. Organisations like Bond have urged the new Prime Minister and his Foreign Secretary to acknowledge the vital role of international development in upholding the UK’s global credibility. They warn that without a clear, strategic vision, the UK risks pursuing global ambitions with reduced institutional capacity and diminished influence.
- Andy Burnham’s government plans to restore UK aid spending to 0.7% of GNI.
- The target was previously cut by Conservative and then Starmer’s Labour governments.
- A roadmap for this increase is expected to be a key policy initiative.
- Nigel Farage has criticised the plan, citing a potential £10bn cost to taxpayers.
- Fleur Anderson, Labour MP, suggested a 10-year return to the target.
- The move aims to re-establish the UK’s role as a global development leader.
Burnham’s commitment to the 0.7% aid target represents a definitive break from recent policy, aligning his government with a more interventionist and globally engaged foreign policy. The financial and political costs will be immediate, but the long-term implications for Britain’s standing and influence are what this government is clearly banking on.
Source: The Telegraph | Breaking Brexit News
Discover more from Breaking Brexit News
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.













Join the discussion
No probs. Its only another 16 billion. You know we can afford it judging by how much money we are piling into our navy and military.