Listen
Tap play to hear this story.
In a significant win for free speech, Scotland’s Crown Office has dropped its appeal against the acquittal of 75-year-old Rose Docherty, a Catholic grandmother who was arrested for holding a ‘here to talk’ sign near an abortion clinic. This decision reinforces the right to peaceful expression, challenging the overreach of buffer zone legislation.
Establishment Retreats on Free Speech
Scotland’s Crown Office has confirmed it will not appeal the acquittal of Rose Docherty, a 75-year-old grandmother, who was cleared of charges related to “influencing” people within an abortion buffer zone. Prosecutors allowed the May 5 deadline to pass without taking action, as reported by GB News.
Mrs Docherty was acquitted on April 27 at Glasgow Sheriff Court, marking the first successful defence against the UK’s national buffer zone legislation. Her legal team, ADF International, stated that the Crown Office’s decision upholds the ruling in favour of free speech.
The Case Against Peaceful Expression
Mrs Docherty was arrested in September last year near Glasgow’s Queen Elizabeth University Hospital for holding a sign that read: “Coercion is a crime, here to talk, only if you want.” According to her legal team, she did not approach anyone or discuss abortion, nor was she protesting or behaving in an intimidating manner.
During her detention, Mrs Docherty, who had undergone a double hip replacement, was allegedly denied a chair. This was her second arrest under the legislation, with prosecutors having previously dropped a similar case from February 2025.
- 75-year-old Rose Docherty arrested for holding a sign in an abortion buffer zone.
- Acquitted after Sheriff Reid ruled prosecution breached her Article 10 rights to freedom of expression.
- Crown Office declined to appeal, letting the deadline pass without action.
- Mrs Docherty is now considering legal action against Police Scotland.
- ADF International hailed the outcome as a “victory for freedom of expression.”
What This Means for Britain
This ruling is a critical moment for free speech and the right to peaceful protest in the UK, especially concerning the increasing implementation of buffer zones.
It means that ordinary citizens, like Mrs Docherty, can challenge what they see as overzealous enforcement of laws that restrict basic freedoms, and win.
The decision highlights concerns about how local authorities and police interpret and apply legislation, potentially impacting fundamental human rights.
For those who believe in British sovereignty and individual liberties, this case demonstrates that the establishment can be pushed back when it oversteps its boundaries.
It also raises questions about accountability for public bodies, with Mrs Docherty now considering legal action against Police Scotland for her treatment.
Share if you believe in protecting free speech for all British citizens.
This article is a factual summary of reporting by GB News. Full original story available on their website. All quotes directly attributed.
Source: GB News | Breaking Brexit News
Discover more from Breaking Brexit News
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Join the discussion
Finally a smidgen of good sense creeping into the judiciary. How innthe name of GOD this two-tier insanity was allowed to proceed at all is beyond any Christian. I’m sure if Allah was being invoked there would be no issue, especially if Mrs Docherty had prostrated herself on the pavement.🤬🤬🤬🤬